Is it nearly time to dump Windows for Chrome OS?
Google shows Microsoft how it’s done with OS updates, but there’s still one thing missing
A few days ago, my Chromebook told me it would like to reboot in order to update its operating system. I'd just made a cup of tea at the time (Bai Mu Dan if you're interested). I hit the power button and nervously watched the progress bar a habit picked up from 30 years of Windows use and it finished updating while the tea was still hot. With the reboot done, a pop-up informed me that I could now download and run Android apps on the Chromebook. That was worth another biscuit (Lotus Biscoff, since you ask).
Running Android apps on the Chromebook had been an ambition of mine for most of the previous year, but up until now it had involved adventures in Developer Mode that I didn't want to attempt. The first driver of this ambition was a need to program in Python on the machine, satisfied instantly by downloading the Android version, QPython3. It compiled and ran everything I've written under Windows, the only change required being to prefix any file paths with "/storage/emulated/0/".
Almost as strong was a desire for certain Android apps I had come to depend upon, including the PC Pro Award-winning Citymapper. I had tried the browser-based version for Chrome, but it was so inferior to the Android app in UI terms that I preferred to use it on my phone or tablet. And that brings me to the main point of this column: like Windows' native applications, Android apps exploit the hardware (especially screen real estate) so much better than browser-based versions that there's no contest.
Another app I use every day is Spotify, on which I listen to music at home via Windows or Chrome OS, or while walking on heath and park on my phone. But, until this update, I had three versions of the Spotify client that differed from one another in various ways; some subtle, some downright infuriating. The Windows version is the most complete, as it supports playlist folders to organise my scores of lists, and also drag-and-drop to rearrange these folders and their contents.
The Android version has folders that aren't drag-and-drop, but it does support a new UI with a taskbar at the bottom that's easier to use on small phone screens. The browser version I'd been using on the Chromebook is a nightmare that doesn't support folders at all, and steamrollers them into un-navigable flat lists that aren't even complete: the Artists tab only displays a fraction of what's there. Spotify deprecates playlists in favour of its newer, non-hierarchical Your Music (Save| Songs| Artists| Albums) system, hence this bodge that I enjoyed uninstalling.
The combination of Google Contacts, Calendar and the ever-increasingly-wonderful Google Keep ensures that all my appointments, addresses, notes and other important data are always automatically synced between Windows, Chrome and Android machines. I can even do voice dictation on my phone and have it there waiting on the desktop when I get home.
So what about writing? Well, the answer is that I'm writing this column in Google Docs. Running Android means that I could now have Microsoft Word, but in truth I stopped using Office even under Windows several years ago, in favour of LibreOffice. Google Docs does everything I need except for simple macros.
Is there a downside? Well, yes: the confusion of three different file locations, the default My Drive in the cloud, the small local Download drive and a separate local Android drive. Apps mostly hide this from you, but it's time Google completed that long-promised merger of Android and Chrome OS.
As a grizzled pioneer of the personal computer revolution, I'll never be entirely happy having everything in someone else's cloud, and will always want local copies of work and vital data, so here's a suggestion. A merged OS (ChromDroid?) might have a file attribute that takes these three values: l = local only; c = cloud only; s = local first, then sync to cloud.
Give me that and Windows would go right, er, out the window.