Supreme court orders Oracle to pay litigation money back

The latest twist in Rimini Street v Oracle goes in favour of the third-party software company

Oracle sign

Oracle has lost a battle with Rimini Street after the US Supreme Court ordered the cloud giant to pay back $12.8 million to the third-party software firm.

It all stems from a copyright infringement and data theft lawsuit filed by Oracle against the software company. Initially, Oracle won a $124 million verdict in 2015, a figure which included some $20 million in costs.

The Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision limiting the scope of costs that can be awarded to the prevailing party in a copyright dispute and the two firms have been locked into multiple lawsuits since 2010. 

However, this latest twist in the saga has seen the US Supreme Court order Oracle to pay back $12.8 million in litigation fees that Rimini Street had initially been ordered to cover.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

"We are pleased with this latest victory in the highest Court, and look forward to continuing our fierce competition with Oracle in the marketplace by providing the best enterprise software support service and value for Oracle licensees worldwide," said Rimini Street CEO, Seth Ravin, who has been exonerated on all claims.

Mark A. Perry of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, who argued the case for Rimini Street in the Supreme Court, added: "The Supreme Court unanimously agreed with the structural, grammatical, and historical arguments that we advanced on behalf of Rimini Street, and rejected the contrary positions put forth by Oracle. The Court brought cost awards under the Copyright Act back into line with hundreds of other federal statutes."

Rimini Street has consistently stated that it was innocent of any copyright infringements levied at it, but Oracle has hit back with a strong statement which suggests that the saga is far from over.

"The Supreme Court's narrow decision today on recovery of a type of cost does not change the fundamental facts of the case," an Oracle statement said.

"Rimini engaged in a massive theft of Oracle's IP and tried to cover it up by destroying evidence and engaging in other litigation misconduct, but it got tagged for its illegal activities anyway by both judge and jury, as the opinion acknowledges.

"And despite its effort to avoid an injunction, Rimini has been enjoined from further infringement."

Featured Resources

Digitally perfecting the supply chain

How new technologies are being leveraged to transform the manufacturing supply chain

Download now

Three keys to maximise application migration and modernisation success

Harness the benefits that modernised applications can offer

Download now

Your enterprise cloud solutions guide

Infrastructure designed to meet your company's IT needs for next-generation cloud applications

Download now

The 3 approaches of Breach and Attack Simulation technologies

A guide to the nuances of BAS, helping you stay one step ahead of cyber criminals

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/business-strategy/mergers-and-acquisitions/354602/xerox-to-nominate-directors-to-hps-board-reports
mergers and acquisitions

Xerox to nominate directors to HP's board – reports

22 Jan 2020
Visit/operating-systems/25802/17-windows-10-problems-and-how-to-fix-them
operating systems

17 Windows 10 problems - and how to fix them

13 Jan 2020
Visit/business-strategy/public-sector/354608/uk-gov-launches-ps300000-sen-edtech-initiative
public sector

UK gov launches £300,000 SEN EdTech initiative

22 Jan 2020
Visit/web-browser/30394/what-is-http-error-503-and-how-do-you-fix-it
web browser

What is HTTP error 503 and how do you fix it?

7 Jan 2020