Liberty defeated in ‘snooper’s charter’ legal challenge

High court rules the government’s Investigatory Powers Act doesn’t breach human rights

Graphic of individuals being glared at by cameras and having their privacy invaded

Ambitions to curb bulk data collection practices in the government's Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IPA) have ended in defeat as judges ruled the bill doesn't infringe on human rights.

The UK-based human rights group Liberty has expressed its disappointment after the High Court quashed its legal challenge against what's commonly dubbed the 'snooper's charter'.

The group's challenge was based on the notion that the IPA violates citizens' right to privacy and freedom of expression as outlined by Article 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Holgate, however, dismissed the claim at the high court in London today, arguing there are appropriate safeguards in place to protect people against abuse of their fundamental rights.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

"This disappointing judgment allows the government to continue to spy on every one of us, violating our rights to privacy and free expression," said Liberty lawyer Megan Goulding.

"We will challenge this judgment in the courts, and keep fighting for a targeted surveillance regime that respects our rights.

"These bulk surveillance powers allow the state to hoover up the messages, calls and web history of hordes of ordinary people who are not suspected of any wrong-doing.

"The Court recognised the seriousness of MI5's unlawful handling of our data, which only emerged as a result of this litigation. The security services have shown that they cannot be trusted to keep our data safe and respect our rights."

Liberty and other human rights and privacy groups have been wrangled in a legal battle with the government over the IPA since its passage through parliament.

This fight has seen the group claim a handful of victories, including a successful challenge last year against the government's power to force communications and internet companies to store data on UK citizens.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Most recently, Liberty challenged the secrecy of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), an independent body that judges whether GCHQ, MI5 and MI6 cyber activity remains within the scope of the law.

Previously, complaints received would lead to judgements being made in secret, but a 4-3 majority on the supreme court ruled these agencies' powers be open to judicial review, and openly challenged in court.

Featured Resources

2,000 days: the CIO's world in 2025

What the role of the CIO will look like in five years time

Download now

The workers' experience report

How technology can spark motivation, enhance productivity and strengthen security

Download now

6 best practices for escaping ransomware

A complete guide to tackling ransomware attacks

Download now

The IT roadmap from modernisation to innovation with consistent hybrid cloud

A guide to a modern, cloud-enabled IT infrastructure

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/policy-legislation/data-governance/354496/brexit-security-talks-under-threat-after-uk-accused-of
data governance

Brexit security talks under threat after UK accused of illegally copying Schengen data

10 Jan 2020
Visit/security/cyber-security/354468/if-not-passwords-then-what
cyber security

If not passwords then what?

8 Jan 2020
Visit/policy-legislation/31772/gdpr-and-brexit-how-will-one-affect-the-other
Policy & legislation

GDPR and Brexit: How will one affect the other?

9 Jan 2020
Visit/web-browser/30394/what-is-http-error-503-and-how-do-you-fix-it
web browser

What is HTTP error 503 and how do you fix it?

7 Jan 2020