California bans police use of facial recognition for three years

California sets a precedent for facial recognition and biometric tech use in law enforcement

Image depicting facial recognition

California passed a bill placing a moratorium on the use of facial recognition technology by state law enforcement for the next three years.

Assembly member Phil Ting introduced The Body Camera Accountability Act earlier this year to prevent the misuse of body cameras, particularly through face and biometric surveillance. San Francisco and Oakland passed similar bills previously, setting a precedent for state-wide legislation to pass.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The bill goes into effect on 1 January, 2020, and expires at the end of 2023 unless further laws are passed.

Ting says the bill will protect Californians' privacy and check police who may be overreaching their exercise of power: "Without my bill, facial recognition technology essentially turns body cameras into a 24-hour surveillance tool, giving law enforcement the ability to track our every movement. Let's not become a police state and keep body cameras as they were originally intended -- to provide police accountability and transparency."

In such a police state, Californians would have to "decide between actively avoiding interaction and cooperation with law enforcement, or having their images collected, analyzed, and stored as perpetual candidates for suspicion", according to Nathan Sheard, Electronic Frontier Foundation's associate director of community organising.

The concerns are warranted, given the history of AI facial recognition abuses by US police forces, including using pictures of a suspect's celebrity look-alike to track down the culprit using facial recognition software.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

Use of AI on the force in a more generalised sense can tend easily toward "Big Brother" territory. For example, law enforcement has used a Palantir AI app capable of turning small pieces of data into a thorough profile of an individual, no warrant necessary. Personal records on finance, health, education, criminal records, permits, licenses, even hobbies like sporting events and concerts a person has attended, are all attainable by police forces from LAPD to ICE.

In July, The House of Commons Science and Technology committee contributed to the global push for more comprehensive AI legislation by calling for the government to issue a moratorium on law enforcement's live facial recognition tech trials until they could address issues of data retention and bias. Since marginalised demographics tend to be targeted more often by AI software than others, they are most threatened by the unchecked use of AI-based facial recognition on the force.

An adoption of California's moratorium across many more states and countries to could give lawmakers time to get legislation sorted before AI encroaches anymore on citizens' rights to privacy.

Featured Resources

The case for a marketing content hub

Transform your digital marketing to deliver customer expectations

Download now

Fast, flexible and compliant e-signatures for global businesses

Be at the forefront of digital transformation with electronic signatures

Download now

Why CEOS should care about the move to SAP S/4HANA

And how they can accelerate business value

Download now

IT faces new security challenges in the wake of COVID-19

Beat the crisis by learning how to secure your network

Download now


public sector

The IT Pro Podcast: Beating Trump on tech

27 Mar 2020
Business operations

FBI takes down British site in a bizarre case of mistaken identity

28 Feb 2020
Network & Internet

Huawei faces 16 charges spanning IP theft to fraud

14 Feb 2020
artificial intelligence (AI)

MIT develops AI tech to edit outdated Wikipedia articles

13 Feb 2020

Most Popular

Microsoft Windows

Microsoft's latest Windows 10 update is causing yet more issues

26 May 2020

Nokia breaks 5G record with speeds nearing 5Gbps

20 May 2020
data breaches

EasyJet faces class-action lawsuit over data breach

26 May 2020