Amnesty International takes Gov to court over spying

Ten human rights orgs take government to the European Court of Human Rights to stop surveillance

A magnifying glass focused on web page

Amnesty International is taking the government to the European Court of Human Rights over its mass surveillance of UK citizens.

The organisation claims the government's practice of mass surveillance goes against human rights, and has issued the legal challenge with another nine bodies.

All object to the government's methods of interception, collection, inspection, distribution and retention of communications "without any judicial authorisation," their filing said.

Their complaint is based on revelations leaked by ex-NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed information on secret US data collection programmes like PRISM, collecting communications data including emails, text messages, phone calls and social media without permission.

The court filing mentioned Tempora, Upstream and PRISM as three of the mass surveillance programmes it was hoping to stop, saying the operations were making it increasingly difficult for Amnesty International to carry out its work.

While based in the US, the PRISM and Upstream programmes extended to UK-held data. Meanwhile Tempora is the UK's own GCHQ programme, giving spooks access to vast swathes of data on millions of people.

"It is thanks only to Edward Snowden's revelations, and the scant disclosures we and the other claimants have been able to prise from the government, that we know anything whatsoever about what the intelligence services are up to," said James Welch, Legal Director for Liberty.

The filing also detailed how a closed hearing took place, outlining Amnesty International and the other applicants' concerns, but none of the bodies were invited to attend because of the sensitive nature of the country's security.

Nick Williams, Amnesty International's legal counsel said: "The UK government's surveillance practices have been allowed to continue unabated and on an unprecedented scale, with major consequences for people's privacy and freedom of expression. No-one is above the law and the European Court of Human Rights now has a chance to make that clear."

Carly Nyst, legal director of Privacy International, added: "Mass surveillance is a violation of our fundamental rights. Intercepting millions of communications every day, and secretly receiving millions more from the NSA by the back door is neither necessary nor proportionate."

Featured Resources

The ultimate guide to business connectivity in field services

A roadmap to increased workplace efficiency

Free download

The definitive guide to migrating to the cloud

Migrate apps to the public cloud with multi-cloud infrastructure solutions

Free download

Transform your network with advanced load balancing from VMware

How to modernise load balancing to enable digital transformation

Free download

How to secure workloads in hybrid clouds

Cloud workload protection

Free download

Recommended

NSA issues guidance on encrypted DNS usage
Domain Name System (DNS)

NSA issues guidance on encrypted DNS usage

15 Jan 2021

Most Popular

How to find RAM speed, size and type
Laptops

How to find RAM speed, size and type

17 Sep 2021
What are the pros and cons of AI?
machine learning

What are the pros and cons of AI?

8 Sep 2021
Best MDM solutions 2020
mobile device management (MDM)

Best MDM solutions 2020

17 Sep 2021