Ministers criticised for failing to back ‘open government'

Organisations pen open letter claiming Brexit is no excuse for falling behind on digital programmes

British flag with binary on it

The government is failing to meet its own bar for transparency and openness in public sector data-sharing and digital programmes, a host of organisations have claimed.

Groups including the Electoral Reform Society and the UK Open Government Civil Society Network have signed an open letter criticising ministers for their lack of public support for open government over the last two years.

This is just days after the government released its fourth 'National Action Plan for Open Government', spanning ideas such as improving the quality of data the government publishes. But this release was delayed for more than a year, and the signatories are criticising ministers for failing to promote its core principles.

Despite praising "reformers" like digital minister Margot James MP, these organisations are "otherwise disappointed by the lack of ministerial engagement since September 2018".

"The commitments in previous UK open government action plans have raised the bar and set the pace for open government reform globally, encouraging other countries and jurisdictions to consider and introduce similar reforms," the signatories said.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

"However, developing and implementing ambitious commitments relies on high-level political support that enables active, meaningful and ambitious collaboration between reformers inside government and civil society.

"Although we appreciate the Government's negotiations with the European Union are a national priority, the lack of high-level political support for open government more generally is having a negative effect across institutions."

Examples that ministers are not taking 'open government' seriously include limited progress in opening up geospatial data and failing to meet performance targets for a flagship digital programme dubbed Verify.

The National Audit Office (NAO) also savaged the Government Digital Service (GDS) in March for bungling the programme. Auditors revealed the government is now expected to save just 217 million versus the initial 873 million when Verify's business case was put forward in 2016.

"The National Action Plan is set against the backdrop of innovative technology being harnessed to erode public trust in state institutions, subverting and undermining democracy, and enabling the irresponsible use of personal information," Margot James wrote in the foreward for the national action plan.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"But where technology can be misused, there are also positive new opportunities to use technology to elevate the voice of citizens, forging new connections between individuals and the state.

"As government we must show the way forward, demonstrating how the use of technology in ethical ways can also be a force for good, empowering citizens to scrutinise the work of those they elect."

The plan makes several commitments around improving the quality of data being released, and strives to raise engagement with wider society on digital and data policy development. Other commitments centre on opening up data sets so the public and press can hold public bodies to account and ensure greater accountability.

The commitments set out also aim to harness the potential for open data at a time, according to the government, where technology like artificial intelligence (AI) is making all organisations more data-driven.

Beyond the Electoral Reform Society and the UK Open Government Civil Society Network, signatories criticising ministers also include the likes of Inolve, the Democratic Society, the Open Data Institute, the Open Contracting Partnership and the Women's Budget Group.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

"While the action plan has now been published, the delay of over a year is still not excusable at a time when openness and participation is needed more than ever," said Electoral Reform Society spokesperson Jess Blair.

Advertisement - Article continues below

"The plan we have now could be more ambitious but there is an opportunity for the government to make further commitments over the next two years and show that they can really walk the walk and not just talk the talk on open government."

The goverment's fourth 'open government' plan lasts three years and involves a series of milestones, across eight individual commitments, that are expected to be hit between now and the end of 2021.

Featured Resources

What you need to know about migrating to SAP S/4HANA

Factors to assess how and when to begin migration

Download now

Your enterprise cloud solutions guide

Infrastructure designed to meet your company's IT needs for next-generation cloud applications

Download now

Testing for compliance just became easier

How you can use technology to ensure compliance in your organisation

Download now

Best practices for implementing security awareness training

How to develop a security awareness programme that will actually change behaviour

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/microsoft-windows/32066/what-to-do-if-youre-still-running-windows-7
Microsoft Windows

What to do if you're still running Windows 7

14 Jan 2020
Visit/operating-systems/25802/17-windows-10-problems-and-how-to-fix-them
operating systems

17 Windows 10 problems - and how to fix them

13 Jan 2020
Visit/operating-systems/microsoft-windows/354526/memes-and-viking-funerals-the-internet-reacts-to-the
Microsoft Windows

Memes and Viking funerals: The internet reacts to the death of Windows 7

14 Jan 2020
Visit/hardware/laptops/354533/dell-xps-13-new-9300-hands-on-review-chasing-perfection
Laptops

Dell XPS 13 (New 9300) hands-on review: Chasing perfection

14 Jan 2020