In-depth

Why earwax & kittens are no recipe for successful IT security

Security researchers claims the unique properties of people's earwax could make it a password killer. Davey Winder's not convinced

Password and username box

Scientists at the Monell Chemical Senses Centre in the US have discovered the aroma of earwax varies from person to person.

More accurately, the chemical compounds that make it smell vary and create a unique waxy identifier.

In fairness, the boffins behind this discovery have not suggested earwax as a replacement for computer passwords, but some security experts are already talking up its potential as an authentication mechanism.

I am not surprised, given my exposure to equally daft-sounding biometric authentication projects in recent years.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

A team in Tokyo has been working on a chair that measures your buttock with 360 pressure sensors, for example.

Then there's cognitive fingerprint technology such as SilentSense, an authentication framework currently being developed by researchers at the Illinois Institute of Technology, which uses 'touch-related' behaviour.

This uses data mined from behaviours, such as screen tapping and gesture creation, and works out a pattern of micro-movements that can uniquely identify a device owner.

The cute kittens were one of the Human Interactive Proofs (HIPS) that were all the rage a couple of years back in research labs. They were used by Microsoft researchers to try and distinguish between bots and humans when accessing forums.

Display a grid of photos with a mix of cats and dogs, and ask the cats to be identified; easy for people, apparently very hard for computers.

The trouble is whenever I am told something is going to be a password killer, I immediately wince; the password is not dead, nor is it terminally ill, and here's why. If biometrics were the answer to user authentication then we would all be using fingerprint scanners routinely by now, and we are not.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The technology has existed for what seems like forever, and is as mature as it can be. Yet still it's a niche methodology. Even the implementation as a device lock and purchase validator on the iPhone 5s is actually less triumphant than you may think; this still needs a password to work with.

The problem with getting caught up in the biometric hype, of which the smell of your earwax has to be the most bizarre yet, is that it misses the point.

We already have secure authentication systems that work, are reasonably secure, easy to use and will not break the bank when it comes to enterprise distribution costs.

Yes, I'm talking about two-factor (or multi-factor) authentication where you know the password alone is not enough, and there's a requirement for something you have in the shape of a token (be that hardware or created in software) to back it up. One will not work without the other.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

The trouble with using body parts is in the argument that a body part cannot change, and is unique. Fine until that fingerprint is cloned (when you cannot change your print like you can your password or token mechanism) or your bottom gets bigger.

Sure, by all means use biometrics as part of your multi-factor authentication solution, but please stop trying to sell me on them as the sci-fi saviour of IT security.

Featured Resources

What you need to know about migrating to SAP S/4HANA

Factors to assess how and when to begin migration

Download now

Your enterprise cloud solutions guide

Infrastructure designed to meet your company's IT needs for next-generation cloud applications

Download now

Testing for compliance just became easier

How you can use technology to ensure compliance in your organisation

Download now

Best practices for implementing security awareness training

How to develop a security awareness programme that will actually change behaviour

Download now
Advertisement

Recommended

Visit/security/internet-security/354417/avast-and-avg-extensions-pulled-from-chrome
internet security

Avast and AVG extensions pulled from Chrome

19 Dec 2019
Visit/security/354156/google-confirms-android-cameras-can-be-hijacked-to-spy-on-you
Security

Google confirms Android cameras can be hijacked to spy on you

20 Nov 2019

Most Popular

Visit/policy-legislation/data-governance/354496/brexit-security-talks-under-threat-after-uk-accused-of
data governance

Brexit security talks under threat after UK accused of illegally copying Schengen data

10 Jan 2020
Visit/security/cyber-security/354468/if-not-passwords-then-what
cyber security

If not passwords then what?

8 Jan 2020
Visit/web-browser/30394/what-is-http-error-503-and-how-do-you-fix-it
web browser

What is HTTP error 503 and how do you fix it?

7 Jan 2020
Visit/policy-legislation/31772/gdpr-and-brexit-how-will-one-affect-the-other
Policy & legislation

GDPR and Brexit: How will one affect the other?

9 Jan 2020