In-depth

Why following Get Safe Online's advice could leave you anything but

Davey Winder points out the short-comings in the password security tools used by Get Safe Online

Password

OPINION: I seem to have become the Mystic Meg of IT security journalism. I mention some potential issue in passing and that very same problem gets exposed elsewhere for all the world to see.

Take the small matter of pathetically poor password strength meters. I recently mentioned them at the very end of a piece about how badly eBay handled its data breach, in that its site features a totally broken one.

This was in light of its suggestion that a seven character string password with one uppercase letter was more secure than a 12-string combination of nine random lowercase letters and three random numbers.

I shouldn't have been surprised, as most (if not all) password strength meters are at best nothing more than eye candy.

My personal surprise meter hit the red within a week of the article being published, after I saw a news story reporting that another site - which really should know better - was also using broken password meters.

The site in question was the Government-backed Get Safe Online, which is described as being a "security service to help protect computers, mobile phones and other devices from malicious attack."

A screenshot of the meter in action showed that the ridiculously insecure combination of a name and date, in this case Julia1984, had been graded as 'exceptional' in terms of strength.

I shouldn't have been surprised, as most (if not all) password strength meters are at best nothing more than eye candy.

It even told the user they had "all the right moves", as far as creating strong passwords are concerned.

If that wasn't bad enough, the password being tested by this user was right there in plain text when the result of the strength meter was returned and displayed on screen for anyone who might be looking over the shoulder of said person to note down.

So that's two alarm bells ringing for the price of one in terms of offering insecure advice and implementing an insecure web service. Nice.

Nobody who knows anything about security would use a first name followed by a year as a password and think it was secure, but it takes a real class of idiot to present this as acceptable to those who don't know anything about security.

There's a widely-used phrase within the IT industry about eating one's own dog food, which essentially means that those offering advice should follow it themselves.

Despite the fact Get Safe Online acted pretty quickly to remove the offending, and offensive, password meter from their site after the story broke, I'm inclined to think that with advice like this being handed out, no wonder reported breaches are on the up.

Featured Resources

BIOS security: The next frontier for endpoint protection

Today’s threats upend traditional security measures

Download now

The role of modern storage in a multi-cloud future

Research exploring the impact of modern storage in defining cloud success

Download now

Enterprise data protection: A four-step plan

An interactive buyers’ guide and checklist

Download now

The total economic impact of Adobe Sign

Cost savings and business benefits enabled by Adobe Sign

Download now

Recommended

8 of the most secure web browsers
web browser

8 of the most secure web browsers

25 Sep 2020
Your essential guide to internet security
Security

Your essential guide to internet security

23 Sep 2020
How to enable private browsing on any device
privacy

How to enable private browsing on any device

22 Sep 2020
Third-party apps are tracking your WhatsApp activity
social media

Third-party apps are tracking your WhatsApp activity

21 Sep 2020

Most Popular

16 ways to speed up your laptop
Laptops

16 ways to speed up your laptop

16 Sep 2020
16 ways to speed up your laptop
Laptops

16 ways to speed up your laptop

16 Sep 2020
The Xbox Series X shows how far the cloud still has to go
Cloud

The Xbox Series X shows how far the cloud still has to go

25 Sep 2020