Analysis

TalkTalk hack: should the company have encrypted customer data?

TalkTalk's CEO has said the company didn't encrypt all its customer data because it wasn't obliged to. Is she right?

One of the most significant questions to have arisen from the hack suffered by TalkTalkis why customers' data stored in the company's databases wasn't encrypted.

It may seem like hubris to many that Dido Harding, TalkTalk's CEO, told The Sunday Times sensitive personally identifiableinformation, including bank account numbers, sort codes and full names, were stored unencrypted because there is no legal obligation to do so.

"We have complied with all our legal obligations in terms of storing of financial information," she claimed.

But is she right - did TalkTalk fulfil its legal obligations even though it didn't encrypt this data?

The answer is, yes and no.

A spokesperson for the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) toldIT Pro: "All organisations must have appropriate security measures in place to prevent the personal data they hold being accidentally or deliberately compromised. Any measures put in place should prevent security breaches or limit the damage if they do occur.

"As one single product cannot guarantee security, we would advise a combination of different tools and techniques. Encryption is just one way of doing this."

However, Mahisha Rupan a senior associate at law firm Kemp Little toldIT Pro: "If TalkTalk was not encrypting its customers' data, which is a fairly standard security technique, TalkTalk will need to show that it utilised other technology to secure and protect the data in a way that would otherwise fulfil its legal obligations."

The matter is now in the hands of the ICO, which will determine if TalkTalk did indeed comply with its legal obligations even though it didn't use encryption, and if the company is found to have failed in its duties, the ICO is able to fine the telco up to 500,000.

Affected customers also have recourse to independent legal action, should they wish.

"As an alternative to enforcement through the Information Commissioner's Office, customers may apply to directly to the courts to enforce their rights under the Data Protection Act 1998 in certain circumstances. Compensation to individuals can only be awarded by the courts and not by the Information Commissioner's Officer," explained Rupan.

However, she cautioned that "So far, very few claims for compensation have been made by individuals and, where they have, the awards have been low."

If you are worried you have been affected by the TalkTalk hack, get advice on what to do next here.

Featured Resources

Managing security risk and compliance in a challenging landscape

How key technology partners grow with your organisation

Download now

Evaluate your order-to-cash process

15 recommended metrics to benchmark your O2C operations

Download now

AI 360: Hold, fold, or double down?

How AI can benefit your business

Download now

Getting started with Azure Red Hat OpenShift

A developer’s guide to improving application building and deployment capabilities

Download now

Recommended

Global ransom DDoS extortionists are retargeting companies
distributed denial of service (DDOS)

Global ransom DDoS extortionists are retargeting companies

22 Jan 2021
Best ransomware removal tools
ransomware

Best ransomware removal tools

22 Jan 2021
Hackers publish over 4,000 files stolen from SEPA in ransomware attack
Security

Hackers publish over 4,000 files stolen from SEPA in ransomware attack

22 Jan 2021
BEC scammers are using Google Forms to identify easy victims
phishing

BEC scammers are using Google Forms to identify easy victims

21 Jan 2021

Most Popular

School laptops sent by government arrive loaded with malware
malware

School laptops sent by government arrive loaded with malware

21 Jan 2021
How to move Windows 10 from your old hard drive to SSD
operating systems

How to move Windows 10 from your old hard drive to SSD

21 Jan 2021
What is the Raspberry Pi Pico?
Hardware

What is the Raspberry Pi Pico?

21 Jan 2021