ICO fines TalkTalk £100k for data breach

Data watchdog found that the company failed to use adequate safeguards

TalkTalk

The ICO has fined TalkTalk 100,000 for failing to protect consumer data from hackers in 2014, when personal details of 21,000 customers were leaked into the public domain.

The regulator said TalkTalk had breached the Data Protection Act because it didn't safeguard the huge amounts of data it held about its customers from staff. Employees were able to imporperly access the information, which was used by fraudsters to make scam calls to customers, using their names, addresses, phone numbers and account numbers.

The investigation revealed it was actually employees of Wipro, a third party company working with TalkTalk to resolve complaints about network coverage, that were able to access and swipe the data. The ICO found three Wipro accounts that had siphoned off the data, although 40 employees in total had access to the information.

"TalkTalk may consider themselves to be the victims here," Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham said. "But the real victims are the 21,000 people whose information was open to abuse by the malicious actions of a small number of people. TalkTalk should have known better and they should have put their customers first."

The ICO said TalkTalk's actions breached the seventh principle of the Data Protection Act because it didn't have the appropriate technical or operational safeguards in place to prevent employees from accessing the confidential information. This is despite the company being aware of regulations surrounding data protection and having ample time to fix the flaws.

"This incident highlights why it is essential for companies to understand exactly how users are interacting with the network and data," Nir Polak, CEO at Exabeam. "Had TalkTalk had a means to monitor the activities of employees and third parties, its incident response team could have spotted the inappropriate access to customer data."

Measures TalkTalk could have taken to prevent employees accessing the data include ensuring the portal where the customer details were stored could only be accessed from authorised devices and preventing anyone from accessing or exporting the information via the portal.

"Big companies have been able to get away with lax security for years," said Jan van Vliet, Digital Guardian's vice president and general manager for EMEA. "Thankfully, with the GDPR now on the horizon, the days for such complacency really are numbered. These businesses can expect to swap a 100,000 fine for data protection breaches for one in the millions."

Featured Resources

The complete guide to changing your phone system provider

Optimise your phone system for better business results

Download now

Simplify cluster security at scale

Centralised secrets management across hybrid, multi-cloud environments

Download now

The endpoint as a key element of your security infrastructure

Threats to endpoints in a world of remote working

Download now

2021 state of IT asset management report

The role of IT asset management for maximising technology investments

Download now

Recommended

What is DevSecOps and why is it important?
Security

What is DevSecOps and why is it important?

30 Oct 2020
Weekly threat roundup: NHS COVID-19 app, Nvidia, and Oracle
Security

Weekly threat roundup: NHS COVID-19 app, Nvidia, and Oracle

30 Oct 2020
Ryuk behind a third of all ransomware attacks in 2020
Security

Ryuk behind a third of all ransomware attacks in 2020

29 Oct 2020
REvil hacking group says it has made more than $100m in a year
Security

REvil hacking group says it has made more than $100m in a year

29 Oct 2020

Most Popular

Do smart devices make us less intelligent?
artificial intelligence (AI)

Do smart devices make us less intelligent?

19 Oct 2020
Best MDM solutions 2020
mobile device management (MDM)

Best MDM solutions 2020

21 Oct 2020
What is Neuralink?
Technology

What is Neuralink?

24 Oct 2020