NotPetya victim sues its insurance company

Zurich Insurance has cited a "nation-state action" exclusion

Broken Oreo biscuits (Mondelez owns Oreo)

A US food distributor that was hit by the NotPetya cyber attack is taking legal action against its insurance company for refusing to pay out on a $100m claim for damages caused by the hack.

Mondelez, which owns popular brands Oreo and Cadbury, was hit by NotPetya twice in 2017, suffering significant damage to its IT infrastructure including hardware. 

According to court papers filed in Illinois, seen by the Financial Times, 1,700 of Mondelez servers and 24,000 of its laptops were rendered "permanently dysfunctional".

NotPetya was first discovered in June 2017 and, unlike most ransomware, it wasn't designed to encrypt files for extortion. Indeed, its simple goal was to cause as much damage as possible and spread within an infected network, permanently scrambling filesystems.

Both the US and UK governments have attributed NotPetya to Russian hackers attacking the Ukrainian government - claims that have been denied by the Kremlin. 

Mondelez originally made claims for the cost of these damages on its property insurance policy, taken out with Zurich. The policy suggested it was covered for physical loss or damage to electronic data, software and physical damage caused by the malicious code or instruction.

The documents claim that Zurich initially promised to pay a $10 million interim payment but later refused, citing an exclusion in the policy for "a hostile or warlike action" by a nation state or people acting on its behalf.

IT Pro has approached Zurich for comment but had not received a response at the time of publication.

Igor Baikalov, chief scientist at Securonix, believes that there's another reason to not pay out. 

"Instead of a war exclusion clause, Zurich should have invoked a gross negligence clause, which is much easier to prove in this case than attribution to a nation-state, particularly considering Mondelez was hit twice by the same ransomware," he said.

"The "fool me once" proverb is fully applicable here: while many companies fall victims to ransomware, one of the first steps to recovery is to make sure it doesn't happen again."

Featured Resources

The complete guide to changing your phone system provider

Optimise your phone system for better business results

Download now

Simplify cluster security at scale

Centralised secrets management across hybrid, multi-cloud environments

Download now

The endpoint as a key element of your security infrastructure

Threats to endpoints in a world of remote working

Download now

2021 state of IT asset management report

The role of IT asset management for maximising technology investments

Download now

Recommended

How can you protect your business from crypto-ransomware?
Security

How can you protect your business from crypto-ransomware?

4 Nov 2019
What is DevSecOps and why is it important?
Security

What is DevSecOps and why is it important?

30 Oct 2020
Weekly threat roundup: NHS COVID-19 app, Nvidia, and Oracle
Security

Weekly threat roundup: NHS COVID-19 app, Nvidia, and Oracle

30 Oct 2020
Ryuk behind a third of all ransomware attacks in 2020
Security

Ryuk behind a third of all ransomware attacks in 2020

29 Oct 2020

Most Popular

Do smart devices make us less intelligent?
artificial intelligence (AI)

Do smart devices make us less intelligent?

19 Oct 2020
Best MDM solutions 2020
mobile device management (MDM)

Best MDM solutions 2020

21 Oct 2020
What is Neuralink?
Technology

What is Neuralink?

24 Oct 2020