Ransomware gangs pretend to delete stolen data to extort victims twice, report warns

Security experts warn that paying ransomware hackers will likely lead to more demands

Lines of code used to create a digital skull

Ransomware gangs are reportedly sending victims fake evidence that stolen data has been deleted, only to use that data again in a second extortion attempt.

Notorious hacking groups such as Sodinokibi, Maze, and Netwalker have been tricking victims into a false sense of security, according to a Q3 Ransomware report from cyber security firm Coveware.

The report found that it has now become the default position for groups to hold onto data they have acquired, regardless of whether a ransomware payment has been paid by the victim. In fact, the cyber security firm found evidence that many groups are providing faked files that claim to prove that the data has been deleted.

Although some victims may decide there are valid reasons to pay, cyber security experts frequently advise against it. This is largely because there is no credible way to prove data has been deleted, or a way to ensure data has been returned, if that was the arrangement. There's also the potential that stolen data has already been traded, sold, or held by other threat actors for reuse.

Conti (aka Ryuk), which was recently revealed to be behind a third of all ransomware attacks in 2020 and is mentioned in the report, was recently blamed for an attack on French IT service Sopra Steria at the end of October. Although the company agreed to pay the ransom demanded by the hackers, it's now believed that the evidence provided to show deletion was in fact fabricated, according to Coveware.

Related Resource

Improving cyber security for remote working

13 recommendations for security from any location

Download now

"Unlike negotiating for a decryption key, negotiating for the suppression of stolen data has no finite end," the report stated. "Once a victim receives a decryption key, it can't be taken away and does not degrade with time. With stolen data, a threat actor can return for a second payment at any point in the future. The track records are too short and evidence that defaults are selectively occurring is already collecting."

Featured Resources

Four cyber security essentials that your board of directors wants to know

The insights to help you deliver what they need

Download now

Data: A resource much too valuable to leave unprotected

Protect your data to protect your company

Download now

Improving cyber security for remote working

13 recommendations for security from any location

Download now

Why CEOS should care about the move to SAP S/4HANA

And how they can accelerate business value

Download now

Recommended

Best ransomware removal tools
Security

Best ransomware removal tools

17 Nov 2020
Sopra Steria cyber attack costs to hit €50 million
Security

Sopra Steria cyber attack costs to hit €50 million

26 Nov 2020
Sophos warns customers of potential data leak
Security

Sophos warns customers of potential data leak

26 Nov 2020
Weekly threat roundup: VMware, GitHub, Facebook, and MobileIron
Security

Weekly threat roundup: VMware, GitHub, Facebook, and MobileIron

26 Nov 2020

Most Popular

80% of cyber professionals say the Computer Misuse Act is working against them
Security

80% of cyber professionals say the Computer Misuse Act is working against them

20 Nov 2020
Cisco acquires container security startup Banzai Cloud
Security

Cisco acquires container security startup Banzai Cloud

18 Nov 2020
350,000 Spotify users hacked in credential stuffing attack
Security

350,000 Spotify users hacked in credential stuffing attack

24 Nov 2020