It's too late to let slip the robodogs of war now we have ransomware

Why bother with killer robots when one dodgy email attachment can shutdown whole organisations?

TV and film have a lot to answer for when it comes to misconceptions of artificial intelligence. Despite rapid advancements in the field, there will never be a bionic man (or woman), David Hasselhoff will never have an autonomous car to fight crime and robots bearing a remarkable resemblance to Arnold Schwarzenegger will never travel back in time to kill someone’s mum. We have much better ideas these days. 

Yet people who should know better are still making statements that sound like they get their intel from the synopsis of a science fiction movie, rather than the facts of the real world. 

During Sky News’ coverage of Remembrance Sunday, General Sir Nick Carter, the UK’s chief of defence, suggested the country’s armed forces should be supplemented by a fleet of Terminators within 10 years. “I suspect we could have an army of 120,000, of which 30,000 might be robots, who knows,” he said.

Bookending specific figures with “I suspect” and “who knows” isn’t the best quote to give an international broadcaster, particularly if the aim is to get more money from the government. Chancellor Rishi Sunak recently postponed a spending review that reportedly involved multi-year defence funding with investment in robot warfare. Carter said he was “going to argue for something like that” to help “modernise” the UK’s armed forces.

This seems to be anything but modern, though, as expensive remote-controlled military hardware, such as drones, have been around for years. If anything, it’s perplexing that a senior military figure would still be so keen on building killing machines in an age where whole organisations can be shut down with just a dodgy email attachment. 

If Carter literally wants robot soldiers, then he needs to look at Boston Dynamics. The famous, yet unprofitable, maker of robodogs and headless running machines has been at it for years and is yet to make anything that would be useful in battle – or anywhere for that matter.  

Better yet, why not look to Russia and its alleged involvement in most large-scale ransomware campaigns. Whole towns in Florida were shut down last year due to successful attacks and 2020 is littered with examples of effective penetration of large organisations. 

Obviously, I would rather have no wars at all, but if we have to, it makes more sense to me to spend our tight recession budget on tools for cyber warfare and not on autonomous tanks and robot soldiers. 2020 has shown us the benefits of remote working, surely that can also include our armed forces?

Featured Resources

Preparing for AI-enabled cyber attacks

MIT technology review insights

Download now

Cloud storage performance analysis

Storage performance and value of the IONOS cloud Compute Engine

Download now

The Forrester Wave: Top security analytics platforms

The 11 providers that matter most and how they stack up

Download now

Harness data to reinvent your organisation

Build a data strategy for the next wave of cloud innovation

Download now

Recommended

What is cyber warfare?
Security

What is cyber warfare?

2 Jun 2021

Most Popular

RMIT to be first Australian university to implement AWS supercomputing facility
high-performance computing (HPC)

RMIT to be first Australian university to implement AWS supercomputing facility

28 Jul 2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G review: A rose-tinted experience
Mobile Phones

Samsung Galaxy S21 5G review: A rose-tinted experience

14 Jul 2021
Zyxel USG Flex 200 review: A timely and effective solution
Security

Zyxel USG Flex 200 review: A timely and effective solution

28 Jul 2021