It's too late to let slip the robodogs of war now we have ransomware

Why bother with killer robots when one dodgy email attachment can shutdown whole organisations?

TV and film have a lot to answer for when it comes to misconceptions of artificial intelligence. Despite rapid advancements in the field, there will never be a bionic man (or woman), David Hasselhoff will never have an autonomous car to fight crime and robots bearing a remarkable resemblance to Arnold Schwarzenegger will never travel back in time to kill someone’s mum. We have much better ideas these days. 

Yet people who should know better are still making statements that sound like they get their intel from the synopsis of a science fiction movie, rather than the facts of the real world. 

During Sky News’ coverage of Remembrance Sunday, General Sir Nick Carter, the UK’s chief of defence, suggested the country’s armed forces should be supplemented by a fleet of Terminators within 10 years. “I suspect we could have an army of 120,000, of which 30,000 might be robots, who knows,” he said.

Bookending specific figures with “I suspect” and “who knows” isn’t the best quote to give an international broadcaster, particularly if the aim is to get more money from the government. Chancellor Rishi Sunak recently postponed a spending review that reportedly involved multi-year defence funding with investment in robot warfare. Carter said he was “going to argue for something like that” to help “modernise” the UK’s armed forces.

This seems to be anything but modern, though, as expensive remote-controlled military hardware, such as drones, have been around for years. If anything, it’s perplexing that a senior military figure would still be so keen on building killing machines in an age where whole organisations can be shut down with just a dodgy email attachment. 

If Carter literally wants robot soldiers, then he needs to look at Boston Dynamics. The famous, yet unprofitable, maker of robodogs and headless running machines has been at it for years and is yet to make anything that would be useful in battle – or anywhere for that matter.  

Better yet, why not look to Russia and its alleged involvement in most large-scale ransomware campaigns. Whole towns in Florida were shut down last year due to successful attacks and 2020 is littered with examples of effective penetration of large organisations. 

Obviously, I would rather have no wars at all, but if we have to, it makes more sense to me to spend our tight recession budget on tools for cyber warfare and not on autonomous tanks and robot soldiers. 2020 has shown us the benefits of remote working, surely that can also include our armed forces?

Featured Resources

Four cyber security essentials that your board of directors wants to know

The insights to help you deliver what they need

Download now

Data: A resource much too valuable to leave unprotected

Protect your data to protect your company

Download now

Improving cyber security for remote working

13 recommendations for security from any location

Download now

Why CEOS should care about the move to SAP S/4HANA

And how they can accelerate business value

Download now

Recommended

What is cyber warfare?
Security

What is cyber warfare?

22 Sep 2020

Most Popular

46 million Animal Jam accounts leaked after comms software breach
Security

46 million Animal Jam accounts leaked after comms software breach

13 Nov 2020
macOS Big Sur is bricking some older MacBooks
operating systems

macOS Big Sur is bricking some older MacBooks

16 Nov 2020
Huawei Mate 40 Pro 5G review: A tragically brilliant Mate
Mobile Phones

Huawei Mate 40 Pro 5G review: A tragically brilliant Mate

26 Nov 2020