‘National security’ can’t be used as an excuse to bypass privacy laws

A preliminary ECJ ruling would limit the power of member states to sidestep privacy and data protection laws

EU member states might no longer be able to cite national security concerns as the basis for flouting data protection and privacy laws in the bulk collection of personal data, according to a preliminary legal judgement.

Security services should not have a blanket power to demand the personal and communications data of citizens from telecoms and tech companies, according to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) advocate general Campos Sanchez-Bordona.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Activities aimed at safeguarding national security - and that don’t rely on the co-operation of third parties - are exempt from the Directive on privacy and electronic communications, the advocate general has said. There are, however, complications that arise when private companies and other organisations are imposed upon by member states to hand over personal and private data.

“When the cooperation of private parties, on whom certain obligations are imposed, is required, even when that is on grounds of national security, that brings those activities into an area governed by EU law: the protection of privacy enforceable against those private actors,” his opinion states.

Related Resource

Testing for compliance just became easier

How you can use technology to ensure compliance in your organisation

Download now

“Accordingly, the Directive is applicable, in principle, where providers of electronic services are required by law to retain data belonging to their subscribers and to activities that are aimed at safeguarding national security and are carried out by the public authorities on their own account, without requiring the cooperation of private parties and not, therefore, imposing obligations on the latter in relation to the management of their businesses.”

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

The advocate general, moreover, has suggested the indiscriminate retention of all traffic and location data of subscribers and registered users to any particular third-party service is entirely disproportionate.

He has recommended that data retention is targeted and limited to certain categories, with access to this data also limited and subject to approval by a court or independent authority. 

There are a handful of circumstances, however, where Sanchez-Bordona sees no reason why data can’t be retained and accessed on a general basis, for example in the event of intelligence pointing to an immediate threat.

Generally, however, such data collection is not compatible with the general EU privacy rules, and should not be exempted from them over national security grounds.

The preliminary ruling is directly antagonistic to the wishes of various EU governments, including and especially the UK, having argued that legislation such as the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 is necessary to keep citizens safe. 

Advertisement - Article continues below

The act, nicknamed the ‘Snooper’s Charter’, contains provisions for bulk data collection and has been subject to various legal challenges through European courts. The UK has argued that the provisions outlined in the legislation should be exempt from privacy laws.

While the advocate general does not speak for the ECJ, their opinion carries great weight in the process by which decisions are reached. Deliberations have begun, and a judgement will be delivered at a later indeterminate date.

Featured Resources

Top 5 challenges of migrating applications to the cloud

Explore how VMware Cloud on AWS helps to address common cloud migration challenges

Download now

3 reasons why now is the time to rethink your network

Changing requirements call for new solutions

Download now

All-flash buyer’s guide

Tips for evaluating Solid-State Arrays

Download now

Enabling enterprise machine and deep learning with intelligent storage

The power of AI can only be realised through efficient and performant delivery of data

Download now
Advertisement

Recommended

Visit/security/privacy/355048/government-may-trace-covid-19-patients-using-mobile-phone-data
privacy

UK government may trace COVID-19 patients using mobile phone data

20 Mar 2020
Visit/policy-legislation/general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/354842/irish-data-regulator-racks-up
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Irish data regulator racks up GDPR cases against Big Tech

24 Feb 2020
Visit/data-insights/data-management/354423/eu-us-data-transfer-tools-used-by-facebook-ruled-legal
data management

EU-US data transfer tools used by Facebook ruled legal

19 Dec 2019
Visit/backup/33385/arcserve-udp-9240dr-review-beef-up-your-backups
backup

Arcserve UDP 9240DR review: Beef up your backups

4 Apr 2019

Most Popular

Visit/infrastructure/server-storage/355118/hpe-warns-of-critical-bug-that-destroys-ssds-after-40000-hours
Server & storage

HPE warns of 'critical' bug that destroys SSDs after 40,000 hours

26 Mar 2020
Visit/software/video-conferencing/355138/zoom-beaming-ios-user-data-to-facebook-for-targeted-ads
video conferencing

Zoom beams iOS user data to Facebook for targeted ads

27 Mar 2020
Visit/cloud/355098/ibm-dedicates-supercomputing-power-to-coronavirus-researchers
high-performance computing (HPC)

IBM dedicates supercomputing power to coronavirus research

24 Mar 2020
Visit/software/355113/companies-offering-free-software-to-fight-covid-19
Software

These are the companies offering free software during the coronavirus crisis

25 Mar 2020