EU considers a five-year ban on facial recognition

An 18-page report proposes putting the tech on hold while regulation is worked out

The European Commission is considering a ban on the use of facial recognition in public spaces, according to reports. 

It wants to suspend use of the technology for up to five years while it works out how best to regulate it, according to an 18-page document seen by the BBC

Advertisement - Article continues below

The commission has argued that new legislation is needed to bolster existing regulation for data and privacy protections. Unlike San Franciso authorities, which banned the technology outright after being deemed "uniquely dangerous and oppressive", the report suggests putting its use on hold while more work is done to assess the possible effects of the technology.

If it goes ahead, the ban could last between three and five years to give the EC time to weigh up "a sound methodology for assessing the impacts of this technology and possible risk management measures could be identified and developed".

The commission has also suggested that additional obligations may be placed on developers as part of the review process, and has urged EU countries to create an authority to monitor new rules.

The Commission's report is similar to proposals from the UK's Information Commissioner's Office which began investigating police use of the technology in 2018. Almost a year later, the regulator demanded police "curb" its usage to allow a code of practice to be established.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

The Home Office and the UK police continued to use facial recognition technology throughout 2019, despite reports of its inaccuracy. According to civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, a Met trial at the 2018 Notting Hill Carnival misidentified 95 people as criminals.

In a seperate investigation, the ICO examined the use of facial recognition at a privately owned site at Kings Cross. The regulator warned that businesses using the surveillance technology needed to demonstrate its use was "strictly necessary and proportionate" and that it had a legal basis.

Featured Resources

Staying ahead of the game in the world of data

Create successful marketing campaigns by understanding your customers better

Download now

Remote working 2020: Advantages and challenges

Discover how to overcome remote working challenges

Download now

Keep your data available with snapshot technology

Synology’s solution to your data protection problem

Download now

After the lockdown - reinventing the way your business works

Your guide to ensuring business continuity, no matter the crisis

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

How to find RAM speed, size and type
Laptops

How to find RAM speed, size and type

3 Aug 2020
How to use Chromecast without Wi-Fi
Mobile

How to use Chromecast without Wi-Fi

4 Aug 2020
How do you build a great customer experience?
Sponsored

How do you build a great customer experience?

20 Jul 2020