Areca Backup review: Capable but flawed

A powerful file-level backup and recovery tool that requires a little too much user intervention to automate

  • Powerful range of features
  • Less immediately approachable than many rivals
  • Scheduling requires manual OS timer configuration

Areca backup is a Java-based open source file-level backup tool for Windows and Linux that, and it’s although not particularly regularly updated – there’s not much to change when it comes to backup utilities – it is actively supported and includes some unusual features, notably delta backup, which stores only modified parts of your files.

Advertisement - Article continues below

It’s not as initially approachable as most similar backup tools we’ve reviewed. Before you can create a backup, you have to create a group – available in the toolbar or as a right-click option in the top right pane of the utility. 

You’ll also have to create a backup target. This is actually where you set up almost every aspect of your backups, including the source directories you’ll be copying, although the naming doesn’t make that very clear.

The first stage is selecting the target location for your backups. This can be an FTP or SFTP repository, or a local repository, including connected USB drives and available network storage drives. We were pleased to find that we could easily browse to and select our NAS, and create a new folder for our backups to live in.

You can set the naming and date schema for this target’s archives here, as well as their storage mode. The available options are Standard, in which a new archive is created for every backup after the first; space-efficient Delta, which – after the first - archives only the parts of files that have been changed, and Image, which creates an archive at your first full backup and updates it every time. 

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below
Advertisement - Article continues below

They’re not to be confused with the backup type, which you’ll set up when you run the backup later; this purely defines how data will be stored on the target.

You’ll have to work down a series of panes in the Target interface to select your backup sources – we appreciated being able to drag folders in from the file manager here, choose what level of compression you want – Zip 64 is default and you can add .zip extensions to make the files more accessible – and whether you want each file archived individually or not. 

You can also apply a range of optional features including encryption, filters to exclude files by extension, name or size, and any scripts you’d like to run before or after your backup job. A plugin, priced at €4 per machine, is available to enable Volume Shadow Copy Services support, allowing files that are currently in use by another application to be backed up, and there’s an API to create your own plugins if you need any more features.

Advertisement - Article continues below

With that done, you can run your backup, at which point you can select whether you want this to be an incremental, full or differential backup. If you want to schedule your backups, you’ll have to use your operating system’s scheduling tools, Areca’s command line interface and a bit of scripting to roll your own automation.

Areca doesn’t have an integrated browser to allow you to search through your backed up files and folders, although you can browse through the files stored on your backup target with varying degrees of ease depending on your folder structure, compression and encryption settings.

It’s easy to find the dated backup you want to recover in Areca’s neatly presented list, and the recovery tool can restore your entire backup to either a new directory or its original directory, with options to restore only newer or deleted files.

Areca Backup is extremely capable, but although there’s plenty of online documentation, its interface isn’t particularly intuitive by current standards and the naming of some features leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to clarity.

It’s a powerful tool, but its unusual choices of terminology, lack of integrated scheduling and paid-for VSC support make Duplicati a better choice, as it’s similarly scriptable and has multiplatform support.

Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/mobile/mobile-phones/355239/microsofts-patent-design-reveals-a-mobile-device-with-a-third-screen
Mobile Phones

Microsoft patents a mobile device with a third screen

6 Apr 2020
Visit/development/application-programming-interface-api/355192/apple-buys-dark-sky-weather-app-and-leaves
application programming interface (API)

Apple buys Dark Sky weather app and leaves Android users in the cold

1 Apr 2020
Visit/software/video-conferencing/355229/zoom-we-moved-too-fast
video conferencing

Zoom CEO admits company "moved too fast" as privacy issues mount

6 Apr 2020