Google ‘must open up over right to be forgotten'

Academics’ open letter calls on the search giant to be more transparent about how it handles such requests

Google Sign

Google has developed its "right to be forgotten" policies away from public scrutiny, according to 80 academics who have written an open letter to the search giant.

The letter accused the tech company of deciding on requests to pull links from its search results "in the dark".

It comes on the first anniversary of the European Court of Justice's right to be forgotten ruling, which states that Google must remove links that are out of date, incorrect, or no longer relevant.

The letter read: "The vast majority of [Google's] decisions face no public scrutiny, though they shape public discourse.

"What's more, the values at work in this process will/should inform information policy around the world. A fact-free debate about the RTBF is in no one's interest."

The academics, who include Ian Brown, professor of information security and privacy at the University of Oxford, and Ellen P Goodman from the Rutgers University School of Law, state two reasons they think Google should make its thinking public.

They argue that it would allow the public to find out how companies like Google use their "tremendous power" over easily-accessed data, and also that Google's actions will affect the future of the right to be forgotten ruling in Europe and perhaps further abroad.

The search giant holds a 90 per cent share of Europe's search market, making it by far the largest search engine in use.

The EU decision effectively puts Google in charge of deciding how to implement the ruling, as well as making it the arbiter of what data about a person should and shouldn't be publically available.

Yesterday the search giant released stats on the 253,617 requests it's had since right to be forgotten was introduced.

It revealed it has pulled down 41 per cent of links, denying 59 per cent of the requests.

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is currently disputing Google's decisions in 48 cases, adding that it has enforcement powers it can use if Google doesn't play ball.

Featured Resources

The ultimate law enforcement agency guide to going mobile

Best practices for implementing a mobile device program

Free download

The business value of Red Hat OpenShift

Platform cost savings, ROI, and the challenges and opportunities of Red Hat OpenShift

Free download

Managing security and risk across the IT supply chain: A practical approach

Best practices for IT supply chain security

Free download

Digital remote monitoring and dispatch services’ impact on edge computing and data centres

Seven trends redefining remote monitoring and field service dispatch service requirements

Free download

Recommended

Senators urge FTC to enforce child privacy laws
privacy

Senators urge FTC to enforce child privacy laws

8 Oct 2021
Are you over-sharing online?
social media

Are you over-sharing online?

1 Sep 2021
What is customer identity and access management? 
identity and access management (IAM)

What is customer identity and access management? 

19 Aug 2021
Pearson fined $1 million for downplaying severity of 2018 breach
data breaches

Pearson fined $1 million for downplaying severity of 2018 breach

17 Aug 2021

Most Popular

Best Linux distros 2021
operating systems

Best Linux distros 2021

11 Oct 2021
HPE wins networking contract with Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games
Network & Internet

HPE wins networking contract with Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games

15 Oct 2021
Veritas Backup Exec 21.3 review: Covers every angle
backup software

Veritas Backup Exec 21.3 review: Covers every angle

14 Oct 2021