Samsung and Amazon fail to meet Greenpeace energy standards

Apple, Dell and HP are all making progress towards sustainability, achieving C+ or above

Green energy tech

A number of tech companies including Samsung, Huawei and Amazon are failing to meet Greenpeace's energy standards, despite saying they're making efforts to be more green.

The charity researched 17 of the world's biggest technology companies for its 2017 Guide to Greener Electronics, ranking their practices across reduction of emissions through renewable energy, use of recycled materials, and elimination of hazardous chemicals.

Samsung, Huawei and Amazon were all graded D or below, meaning the way they're being run needs to dramatically change if they're to make a significant change to the fortunes of the world's environment.

"Tech companies claim to be at the forefront of innovation, but their supply chains are stuck in the Industrial Age. We know they can change. Rather than fuelling climate change, IT companies need to show the way forward, just as some companies like Google and Apple have with data centres run on renewables," said Gary Cook, senior IT campaigner at Greenpeace USA.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

Greenpeace explained that Samsung still heavily relies on fossil fuels to produce its products, which is putting a huge burden on the environment. It noted that in 2016, only 1% of the 16,000 GWh of energy used to create its products came from renewable sources.

"It's clear the impacts of the linear take-make-waste business model of device manufacturers extend beyond the concerns of e-waste. We need to see greater ambition, more transparency, and follow through from companies to address the environmental impacts of their enormous supply chains. The current model cannot be maintained," said Cook.

However, Greenpece praised the efforts of Fairphone, Apple, Dell and and HP for leading the drive to be more sustainable, achieving a B, B-, C+ and C+ respectively in the company's grading structure.

However, Apple is apparently "going backwards" when taking sustainable product design into account because many of the components of its products can't be recycled, unlike HP and Dell's which can be upgraded fairly easily without damaging the environment.

Featured Resources

The IT Pro guide to Windows 10 migration

Everything you need to know for a successful transition

Download now

Managing security risk and compliance in a challenging landscape

How key technology partners grow with your organisation

Download now

Software-defined storage for dummies

Control storage costs, eliminate storage bottlenecks and solve storage management challenges

Download now

6 best practices for escaping ransomware

A complete guide to tackling ransomware attacks

Download now
Advertisement

Most Popular

Visit/security/identity-and-access-management-iam/354289/44-million-microsoft-customers-found-using
identity and access management (IAM)

44 million Microsoft customers found using compromised passwords

6 Dec 2019
Visit/hardware/354237/five-signs-that-its-time-to-retire-it-kit
Sponsored

Five signs that it’s time to retire IT kit

29 Nov 2019
Visit/cloud/microsoft-azure/354230/microsoft-not-amazon-is-going-to-win-the-cloud-wars
Microsoft Azure

Microsoft, not Amazon, is going to win the cloud wars

30 Nov 2019
Visit/operating-systems/microsoft-windows/354297/this-exploit-could-give-users-free-windows-7-updates
Microsoft Windows

This exploit could give users free Windows 7 updates beyond 2020

9 Dec 2019