London police chief calls for AI legal framework

The Metropolitan Police started using live facial recognition in January

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) by the police force should be specified by a legal guideline, according to Metropolitan police commissioner Cressida Dick.

The UK's top-ranking member of the police called on the government to create a legal framework for police use of new technologies such as AI, biometrics and DNA.

Advertisement - Article continues below

She told reporters that “the best way to ensure that the police use new and emerging tech in a way that has the country’s support is for the government to bring in an enabling legislative framework that is debated through Parliament, consulted on in public and which will outline the boundaries for how the police should or should not use tech”.

The news comes after the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) published a study over the weekend calling for frameworks to ensure that data analytics, AI and computer algorithms used by the police force were developed "legally and ethically". 

Last year, a report by the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) claimed that UK police are wary of the possibility that the lack of consistent guidelines for automated technology has a potential to "amplify" prejudices.

The main reason for the demands for “crucial” oversight of police AI use is the risk of discrimination. Although Dick agrees that legal frameworks are needed, she disagreed with critics that facial recognition algorithms are racially discriminatory:

“We know there are some cheap algorithms that do have ethnic bias but, as I’ve said, ours doesn’t and currently the only bias in it is that it shows it is slightly harder to identify a wanted woman than a wanted man,” said the police commissioner. The Metropolitan Police’s facial recognition technology is reportedly provided by NEC.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Last month, the Metropolitan Police started using live facial recognition (LFR) on the streets of London. The decision was slammed by privacy campaigners and called a "serious threat to civil liberties".

“Give us the law and we’ll work within it,” Dick told reporters.

Featured Resources

Top 5 challenges of migrating applications to the cloud

Explore how VMware Cloud on AWS helps to address common cloud migration challenges

Download now

3 reasons why now is the time to rethink your network

Changing requirements call for new solutions

Download now

All-flash buyer’s guide

Tips for evaluating Solid-State Arrays

Download now

Enabling enterprise machine and deep learning with intelligent storage

The power of AI can only be realised through efficient and performant delivery of data

Download now

Most Popular

cyber crime

FBI warns of ‘Zoom-bombing’ hackers amid coronavirus usage spike

31 Mar 2020
data breaches

Marriott data breach exposes personal data of 5.2 million guests

31 Mar 2020
application programming interface (API)

Apple buys Dark Sky weather app and leaves Android users in the cold

1 Apr 2020
data management

Oracle cloud courses are free during coronavirus lockdown

31 Mar 2020